The problem with the full body scanners is that most people don't want to be standing naked in front of a government agent. There is obviously a privacy issues there. However the government in Netherlands said it will start using full-body scanners on flights to the US within three weeks.
In the meanwhile, currently suspect practices beat the current scanners. Airport security remains fragile. The president of the United States Barack Obama yesterday called the entire event a "systemic failure."
The full body scanners will be used in Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport within three weeks in the flights bound to U.S.
Would this mean flying from Amsterdam to U.S. is safer than flying from other European destinations? Because of this question other European countries may follow the Dutch decision and start using full body security scanners on other major European cities as well.
The usage of full body scanners are very controversial in USA. However, it seems that the society may get over it and be fine with them used for the sake of safety and security.
In the story on the same topic, published by CNN, its shown that the Dutch authorities did not know that the suspect was in a watch list in USA. Therefore, they call for a global watch list so all airports can have access and the information can be shared more easily.
In the meanwhile, when you travel, don't carry liquids in your carry-on bags. Instead of paying for your check-in luggage, consider sending it before hand by an express mail delivery option. The price may be the same, while you save time and is hassle-free. The busiest airport times are between 6 and 8:30 a.m. If possible try to plan your trip after that time.
Written by Armen Hareyan
HULIQ.com
Comments
Post new comment