New Hampshire Primary Results Predictions

Follow us on Twitter

We are less than 24 hours away from the results of the New Hampshire primary, and we here at Civic Alert know that you are excited, not only for the assuredly exciting results, but also for our Civic Alert Liveblog of the primary.

Like we did for Iowa, all four writers here at Civic Alert will be providing you with up-to-the-minute reports on the results from the Granite State. So whether you’re separated from a t.v. or radio and want to follow the coverage on New Hampshire Primary Results, or would just like a witty, humorous and helpful supplement to increase your primary enjoyment, make sure you join us right here tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. Eastern, 7:00 p.m. Central for the Civic Alert New Hampshire Liveblog.

If you can’t wait that long, don’t worry, because our expert team of writers have pooled together their incredible political experience to accurately predict the winners and losers before the first vote is even placed. In other words, we’re guessing. To get an idea of how we think tomorrow night will end up, continue on past the jump for our Granite State predictions.

Scott:

I think New Hampshire won’t be nearly as surprising as the Iowa caucus ended up. From the Democrat side, I would be shocked to see anything but an Obama first place finish, followed by Hillary in second and Edwards in a close third. Obama is soaring off of the momentum from winning Iowa right now, and with the added support of New Hampshire’s 40% independent population, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him beat Hillary by double-digits. While I do expect Hillary to do better in the state that made her husband the “Comeback Kid” in 1992, I wouldn’t put a very close third place finish by John Edwards out of the question. It might be just what he needs to take another second place win away from Hillary in the upcoming Nevada caucuses.

Democrats:
1. Barack Obama – 39%
2. Hillary Clinton – 28%
3. John Edwards – 25%
4. Bill Richardson – 8%

As always, the Republicans are a little harder to call. While I’m going to side with everybody else and say that McCain will take first simply because the strongly independent New Hampshire loves the man, I don’t think it’ll be a runaway victory. With the quite likely possibility that McCain will lose much of the independent vote to Obama, I expect Mitt to have a much closer second place finish than he did in Iowa. Bringing up third place will be a close race between Giulliani, Paul, and Huckabee. I’m going to say that Giulliani will prevail because of New York City’s proximity to New Hampshire and because northeasterners simply don’t know who Mike Huckabee is. If Huckabee is lucky, he won’t take fifth, which would be huge blow to the momentum he received from Iowa.

Republicans:
1. John McCain – 32%
2. Mitt Romney – 28%
3. Rudy Giulliani – 13%
4. Mike Huckabee – 12%
5. Ron Paul – 11%
6. Fred Thompson - 4%
7. Duncan Hunter – Please

Amy:

Democrats
1. Barack Obama
2. Hillary Clinton
3. John Edwards

Republicans
1. John McCain
2. Mitt Romney
3. Mike Huckabee/Ron Paul toss up

Why New Hampshire will be important: The differences between Iowa and New Hampshire make this almost a completely new race. Replace evangelical Christian conservatives with economic-oriented independents. The differences in population and issues leads New Hampshire voters to place less emphasis on the results of Iowa and more on their own, varying opinions. Take 2000 for example. George Bush rocked Iowa, then got pummeled by McCain in New Hampshire. This makes for a volatile, unpredictable primary that is sure to have some twists. Yet I still followed the trend and put Obama and McCain and the top. Why? Perhaps some wishful thinking. But also, both have traits that draw in the independent votes, as Obama proved in Iowa. I think we will see these candidates triumph, but witness more variances in the runner-ups, with maybe even a burst of Ron Paul energy in this libertarian heavy state. Still, with another pivotal state putting Romney and Clinton on the back burner, I think their campaigns will need to hurry up and rethink their strategies in order to hold out in the rest of the race.

Kyle:

For the Dems, I see Barack Obama continuing to widen his lead over Hillary in the New Hampshire primary. The latest CNN poll shows him at 39% but I think he’ll break 40%. Hillary will continue to fall and I feel that will give support to both Obama and Edwards. No surprises with the lower-tier Democratic candidates. Fourth place will probably go to Richardson with about 5%.

1st- Barack Obama 44%
2nd- Hillary Clinton 28%
3rd- John Edwards 22%
4th- Bill Richardson 4%
5th- Dennis Kucinich 2%

The Republican race could be much closer. The crypt keeper John McCain is in a good position to win in New Hampshire, just as he did in 2000. Romney again will come in a disappointing 2nd place. Just as in the Iowa Caucus, there will be a battle for 3rd. This time between Ron Paul, who I expect to improve on his 10% performance in Iowa, Rudy Giuliani, and Mike Huckabee, whose Huckaboom just hasn’t caught on yet in New Hampshire.

1st- John McCain 35%
2nd- Mitt Romney 26%
3rd (My big upset pick) Ron Paul 16%
4th Mike Huckabee 13%
5th Rudy Giuliani 8%
6th/7th Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson will split the last 2%

Who will be triumphantly right and who will be embarrassingly wrong? Join us tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. Eastern and 7:00 p.m. Central for our New Hampshire Liveblog to find out. By Civic Alert

Your comments...

Embarrassingly wrong?

GT's picture

Embarrassingly wrong? Everyone (with the exception of a differently chosed 3rd place republican) had the same answer!

McCAIN?

drawler's picture

How can the people in the Live-Free-or-Die state vote for the uber warmonger McCain? While all of the Republican candidates, except Ron Paul, are warmongers, McCain is the worst. I think that his years of imprisonment and torture must have affected his mind. If you want another stay-the-course guy, McCain is the man. He's already said he'd keep us in Iraq for a hundred years, if necessary. Believe me, for a man like him, it will be necessary. If, on the other hand, you'd like the troops to come home and defend America and not American business interests abroad, and spend the saved money here at home on the people who pay the taxes, then Ron Paul is the man.

McCain?

Bernie's picture

Taken right out of a Ron Paul pamphlet. McCain has the experience to know how to save the most lives. Americans and non-americans. He is not a stay the course guy at all. Have you ever listened or read a thing he is about? There is actually a whole world outside of the US. It actually affects us all. Vote Pat Buchanan if you are as isolationist as you seem.

Ron Paul is not an

Jon Craig's picture

Ron Paul is not an isolationist!!!!! Just because he doesn't want to occupy Iraq for 100 years and waste American lives doesn't mean he's an isolationist! There's two choices for president in the GOP...Rudy McRomney Thompson or Paul...i pick the latter. www.ronpaul2008.com

Ron Paul as 3rd place pick

John Caldwell's picture

Ron Paul definitely has enough momentum to surprise everybody.....guess we'll see.

Wake up Sheeps !!

A Sheep's picture

American Sheeps, please wake up. The World elects Dr Ron Paul for U.S president.... who would Americans elect?
http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/

Mod Squad

david b. sherman's picture

the Dems have a white guy, a black guy and a blonde, reminds me of the
70's.

Hillary seems to be fading fast as younger voters turn out for Obama.

Another question is how many indy voters in NH pulled a lever for Obama
to spite Clinton.

The joker in the deck is a well qualified name not seen today
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG....He had only been registered 3 ways in the last
10 years.

Being tall has not helped Fred much since IOWA, looks like it was a good
idea keeping his SAG card....will the campaign end before the Writers end
their strike ?

Conclusion: The general election this year is not a layup for the Dems.