The international news agencies are already reporting that the United States House of Representatives just passed an economic stimulus package that president Bush, republicans and the democrats had tentatively agreed upon last week.
Proponents of the economic stimulus plan are hoping that this will keep the U.S. Economy, which is now near recession, or according to some analyst in full recession, rolling and by giving tax rebates to individuals and households would help to provide the necessary spending that the businesses need to keep their sales intact.
Reuters reports that the stimulus package includes "tax rebates of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for married couples, plus $300 per child. The legislation also includes tax breaks to encourage business investment in new equipment."
The stimulus package that the Congress just passed with cost the treasury about $146 billion dollars, the Joint Tax Committee estimates.
This economic bill next will go to the Senate, where Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat, will be offering an alternative that would provide a flat $500 tax rebate to all eligible people, $1,000 for couples and $300 per child.
Two bills are not very much different from each other, however, last night President Bush warned against changing this economic stimulus package that they had agreed upon with Nency Pelosi, and The Secretary of The Treasury Paulson.
News reports use one or two dollar figures to explain proposed rebates for economic stimulus, but rebate amounts may vary significantly – particularly for lower-income Americans – unless Congress acts. Rather than a variable rebate based on taxable income and liabilities, the Finance Committee would provide a check for $500 to every American filing a 2007 tax return reporting $3000 of wages, Social Security income, or self-employment income. The check doubles for married couples filing jointly. Families with children under 17 would receive an additional $300 per child. Allowing Social Security as qualifying income will let more Americans participate in economic stimulus.
A fair, flat tax rebate: every recipient gets the same for themselves and for kids.
The Finance Committee plan is simple: qualify for the rebate, and get a set amount.
Tax Rebates under the House proposal, meanwhile, are currently set based on a host of factors, including how much income you have, what type, and what kind of taxes
Fewer restrictions make more Americans a part of economic growth.
The Finance Committee plan treats Social Security retirement or disability benefits the same as taxable wages – giving more Americans the same rebate, and a chance to contribute to economic growth.
At a recent Senate Finance Committee hearing, Congressional Budget Office Director Peter Orszag said that a flat rebate proposal (including child bonuses) available to payroll taxpayers with no income tax liability “would likely have a higher cost-effectiveness” for economic stimulus.1 In the same way, American seniors are a prime target for economic stimulus. Americans over age 65 spend 92 percent of their incomes within a given year – that’s higher than any other demographic group over the age of 25.2 - Source: HULIQ, includes information from
Posted January 29th, 2008 by admin_huliq
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THEY DO IF A CHILDS PARENTS ARE NOT TOGETHER. WE ALTERNATE YEARS OF CLAIMING HIM SO WHO WILL GET THE CREDIT?
I would bet that whomever claimed the child for the year 2007 willl get the refund since they already claimed the child for that years tax's which is what it is, a rebate on 2007.
Why is the cut off age 17? I have a highschool Sr. that is 18 living at home and could use the credit for him as well. What gives?
I am wondering the same thing about the cut off age. I also have a Senior in highschool living at home. Plus I have a 19 year old we support 100% living here at home trying to help get through college. Some people have kids that are 19 finishing High School.
Cranking up the printing presses and giving away free paper will simply result in dilution of the money supply and increased inflation. The only people who might actually benefit are the very old, who might have the opportunity to spend theirs and die before the long term economic effects kick in.
I have a son who is 18 living at home & a high school senior, he is employed part-time but is still financially dependent on his parents... He made less than $3,000 income. Will he qualify as a dependent child under my husband & me for the rebate? Or will he be able to qualify on his own for the rebate?
He will not qualify for the $300.00 rebate, but you will be able to claim him as a dependent. My daughter paid into taxes too, made over $3600.00, and since she paid in, she got pretty much everything back from that. It sucks that the government cuts these young people out, when they need a break just like anyone else!!As long as you claim them for a dependent, and they are 17 and older...it's a "NO!"
I for one have never understood why you lose the child tax credit just when kids start costing you more money. And my son nor I get the Economic Stimulus portion based on the fact that he is 18, senior in high school and has a part time job. Who do we officially complain to?
This is a great passage by
This is a great passage by the house. An economic stimulus package with a Tax Rebate is what many Americans need.
However, I am still trying to understand which one will be better the House / President Tax Plan or the one presented in the Senat. The senat offers 500 dollar flat tax rebate to all, the House's economic plan, I believe, is little higher but selective. Is this true?