Dems Unable To Cut Private Medicare Advantage Payments
View Related News
The effort, led by Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus (D-MT) got only 54 of the 60 votes he needed to end debate and move the issue to a floor vote. While getting that floor vote would almost have certainly meant passage of the bill in the full Congress, President Bush would have vetoed any attempt to cut the payments to private Medicare plans and the Dems would not have had the votes in either chamber to override.
Now, Baucus and Senate Finance Ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) will have to find a more modest way of fixing the doc problem––likely for just six months. The docs are not going to suffer a Medicare payment cut this summer.
All of this was expected and is what I have been saying for months would happen.
A temporary fix to the Medicare physician payment problem--the docs will be facing a 15% cut on January 1, 2009--will just shunt the problem off to next January. After January 20th, George Bush will be gone. Barack Obama will have no problem signing a bill with big Medicare Advantage cuts in it. John McCain was one of only a handful of Republican Senators who voted against the Medicare Modernization Act, that created this version of private Medicare, in the first place.
This time, Baucus only tried to nail the private-fee-for-service (PFFS) version by making the relatively reasonable proposal that PFFS plans develop provider networks by 2011 in all but the most rural markets. Since PFFS was only supposed to be a transitional product to real network plans when it was first created in 2003, that's hardly an unreasonable idea. But Bush would have vetoed even that.
Next time around, with a more willing President sitting down the street, the Democrats aren't going to be so generous. The health insurance industry would have been smart to take this deal. But even so incremental a deal as this would have badly hurt the PFFS guys who have been gaming the system with their inch deep and a thousand miles wide strategies for penetrating the private Medicare market.
Sooner or later the mainstream Medicare Advantage insurers are going to cut the PFFS guys loose, who have been gaming this system, in order to save what the program was supposed to be in the first place.
It's not clear to me what Wall Street is so relieved about.
Written by ROBERT LASZEWSKI of http://healthpolicyandmarket.blogspot.com/
Posted June 16th, 2008 by admin_huliq
Got News?
Pictures for this story
Most Hits
- Hurricane Ike Path Likely To Pass Through Gulf733
- How Genocides Are Covered Up By Western media149
- Blackpool Theatre Presents Yer Space130
- Paralympics Changing Attitudes In China102
- Obama, McCain Spar on Social Security96
- London Exchange Creates Sub-Millisecond Access To Markets85
- Leftists in Poland call for referendum on U.S. missile base78
Medicare Disadvantage.
I find it interesting that the American people are forced to sign up for Medicare at age 65. Thus putting them into a system that is going bankrupt in years to come. This also allows their private insurance company to become secondary. The patient continues to pay their insurance company the same premiums but now only having to pay 20% of Medicare allowalbe charge. If that was not bad enough, Medicare then encourages private insurance companies to "come after them" with the Medicare Advantage plans. I have never seen so many crooked salesmen that are out there signing up Medicare patients. They are telling the patient that the new MA policy is not going to cost them anything and that all doctors accept their plans. I do not. The patients are shocked when I tell them that Medicare is deducting the premiums from their checks each month and "adding ~12%", then sending this to their MA company.
If I didn't know any better, I would say that the insurance companies have majority of our representatives in their pockets. Meanwhile, the physicians are being robbed blind.
Obama may be the only answer to putting an end to the love affair between Congress and the insurance industry. BUT...a national healthcare plan will not work. How can you have a national healthcare plan without physicians?