Error message

Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2405 of /home/hulijedw/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

San Francisco contemplates ban on sale of pets

Sandy Smith's picture

Talk about "using an atomic bomb to kill an ant" -- to deal with a problem with unwanted hamsters in the city's animal shelter, the city of San Francisco is considering a ban on the sale of all pets except fish.

If the San Francisco Commission on Animal Control and Welfare approves the proposal at its scheduled meeting tonight, the city would be the first in the country to enact such a ban.

If it passes, San Franciscans seeking animal companions would have to adopt them from shelters, find them through the classifieds, or visit pet stores in neighboring cities.

Pet store owners, needless to say, are howling, squawking, screeching and yelping over the prospect of a ban. "It's terrible. A pet store that can't sell pets? It's ridiculous," San Francisco pet store manager John Chan told the San Francisco Chronicle. His pet store, in business for 30 years, would have to close, he added.

The idea began as a proposal to ban sales of dogs and cats two years ago. The commission at the time was looking for ways to discourage puppy and kitten mills. But city animal shelter officials said that local animal rescue groups took care of most of the abandoned dogs and cats, and besides, only a few pet stores in the city sold them -- the rest sold only small animals.

Hamsters were the real problem, the officials said. The rodents are apparently the "Gremlins" of the pet world -- cute, furry and cuddly when young, but high-strung and destructive when they grow up: the nocturnal creatures bite and gnaw a lot and have a taste for expensive electrical wiring. Because no one wants to adopt adult hamsters, no rescue groups exist to save them and they fill the shelter. The city's animal care and control director, Rebecca Katz, said hamsters were the most frequently euthanized animals in the city shelter.

A pet industry representative took issue with the city's approach. Michael Maddox, general counsel for the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council in Washington, D.C., cited studies by the University of California, Davis, and the National Council on Pet Population Study and Policy that show that only a small fraction of shelter animals were purchased at pet stores.

The commission says it will take into account testimony from pet store owners and others before reaching a decision. It will also consider the effect a ban would have on small businesses and consider possible modifications or exemptions as well.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle - SFGate.com

Comments

Submitted by Diane Amble (not verified) on
The Animal Welfare Commission is so filled with anti-pet commissioners it is unfair and unbalanced. Not a one of them seem to respect free enterprise nor the economics of a city. If they ban the sale of pets, people will drive to Daly City and get the same pet they would have bought in SF. While they are there, they will shop at the mega mall, and eat out with probably the whole family, since getting a pet usually brings the whole family out for the event. The loss? SALES TAX, JOBS, PAYROLL TAXES, JOBS for San Francisco. BUT WHAT DO THEY CARE?

Submitted by Mike in Texas (not verified) on
Another benefit of the internet. I can always find another reason to be glad I live where I do. Let's see, it is OK to have a pet in San Francisco, you just might have to buy it somewhere else? Incredible logic!

Submitted by Bear Bear (not verified) on
This is fabulous!! These animal organizations are getting very smart. There is a new pro-animal site geared towards the press--totally free--that is massively distributing their pro-animal video. The video is showing up on MTV, NBC, etc. A CNN story that just aired is at http://freeanimalvideo.org/about

Add new comment