Submitted by John Frye (not verified) on Thu, 2007-12-13 12:25.
The 12 different lot numbers given by Merck correspond to 9 reported adverse events in the VAERS register as at 13th December 2007. This gives a report of less than 1 adverse report per lot of vaccines.
Is this the new 'gold standard' to recall dangerous vaccines?
I note particularly that an earlier lot number of HibV namely 007 (7U) does have a licence to be injected into babies and evidently a “licence to kill”. Has this lot number been recalled? Evidently not, as it is still deemed safe! There are 3 recorded deaths alone during August 2007 from multiple vaccines containing Merck HibV 0077U vaccine. In all cases the little child died after just one day.
The record is informal, may be subject to errors and often other adverse events may not get onto the record.
But this is an extract from a blog about vaccines by an unqualified but curious friend of a father whose child died suddenly in his arms. It was written three years ago:
“The kids died 2 or 3 days after having multiple vaccines administered, and one after another, the autopsy showed cause of death to be SIDS. In some cases, they died IN THE DR's OFFICE!....still...cause of death: SIDS.”
Where is the evidence that multiple vaccines are safe and how do we pin point the blame if death occurs from a melange of vaccines?
The blog also notes that those who dislike vaccines cannot pick and choose the safe ones. Why not? Do they have refuse to take a mercury containing vaccine for a trivial illness knowing the mercury will destroy all brain cells they come into contact with and thereby they are forbidden to take a vaccine to prevent a very dangerous illness when this vaccine has a 100% good safety record.
The world of vaccines is indeed the world of the Mad Hatter!
Merck's 007 'Licence to Kill'
The 12 different lot numbers given by Merck correspond to 9 reported adverse events in the VAERS register as at 13th December 2007. This gives a report of less than 1 adverse report per lot of vaccines.
Is this the new 'gold standard' to recall dangerous vaccines?
I note particularly that an earlier lot number of HibV namely 007 (7U) does have a licence to be injected into babies and evidently a “licence to kill”. Has this lot number been recalled? Evidently not, as it is still deemed safe! There are 3 recorded deaths alone during August 2007 from multiple vaccines containing Merck HibV 0077U vaccine. In all cases the little child died after just one day.
The record is informal, may be subject to errors and often other adverse events may not get onto the record.
But this is an extract from a blog about vaccines by an unqualified but curious friend of a father whose child died suddenly in his arms. It was written three years ago:
“The kids died 2 or 3 days after having multiple vaccines administered, and one after another, the autopsy showed cause of death to be SIDS. In some cases, they died IN THE DR's OFFICE!....still...cause of death: SIDS.”
Where is the evidence that multiple vaccines are safe and how do we pin point the blame if death occurs from a melange of vaccines?
The blog also notes that those who dislike vaccines cannot pick and choose the safe ones. Why not? Do they have refuse to take a mercury containing vaccine for a trivial illness knowing the mercury will destroy all brain cells they come into contact with and thereby they are forbidden to take a vaccine to prevent a very dangerous illness when this vaccine has a 100% good safety record.
The world of vaccines is indeed the world of the Mad Hatter!
John Fryer MSc BSc Advanced Analytical Chemist