Submitted by Mong H Tan, PhD (not verified) on Thu, 2008-02-21 23:01.
RE: Science must understand (but not fear or mock) Religion, and vice versa!
I would like to congratulate the qualified Oxford researchers for their endeavors well undertaken; and forever scientifically and rationally, mute the irrational anti-religious Scientism of their colleague’s as expressed in Richard Dawkins’ 2006 book “The God Delusion”—whose abusive use of Darwinism as his personal “hysterical atheism” is unconscionable, by any scholarly standards, let alone scientific, philosophical, or critical in pursuit of religious matters!
Author “Decoding Scientism” (work in progress since July 2007).
RE: Science must understand
RE: Science must understand (but not fear or mock) Religion, and vice versa!
I would like to congratulate the qualified Oxford researchers for their endeavors well undertaken; and forever scientifically and rationally, mute the irrational anti-religious Scientism of their colleague’s as expressed in Richard Dawkins’ 2006 book “The God Delusion”—whose abusive use of Darwinism as his personal “hysterical atheism” is unconscionable, by any scholarly standards, let alone scientific, philosophical, or critical in pursuit of religious matters!
Author “Decoding Scientism” (work in progress since July 2007).